White House Threatens Future of Internet


WASHINGTON — A September 29 meeting at the White House may have a major impact on the future of free speech and the Internet. Drug lobbyists are seeking to get ICANN to delete the domain name registrations of companies which do not comply with US law, even if those companies are based overseas and are complying with the laws of their native countries.
Such a move would be nothing less than an existential threat to the Internet and hence to free speech and all of the benefits which the Internet has brought about.
Ostensibly the meeting is to address the matter of importation of pharmaceutical drugs by US residents. Some nations do not require prescriptions for certain drugs, and recently a teenager reportedly overdosed on a painkiller purchased over the Internet.
Most nations impose regulation on pharmaceutical products. The United States remains the most profitable market for drugmakers. As more Americans order drugs from Canada and elsewhere, the drug lobbyist, known as Big Pharma, see a significant long-term threat to the profitability of pharmaceutical manufacturers. A former Bush administration official, John Horton, set up a company while he was still working in the White House, and that company (now known as LegitScript.com) claims to vet websites selling drugs. Horton argues that he didn't actually set up the company until two weeks after he left the administration but rather he only set up domain names for it. Therefore, he was in compliance with federal ethics laws.
The problem is that Horton's major competitor is New York-based PharmacyChecker.com--and the site is not sufficiently restrictive for the tastes of Horton's financial backers. A close examination of Horton's statements as to his financial support leads many to suspect that Big Pharma is the de facto funder of Horton's site via purchasing "research reports" offered for sale by LegitScript.
All of this would not be news to any uninsured American who has followed the debate over importation of pharmaceuticals. And the practice is so common that the US government has an informal understanding that shipments of drugs for personal use not exceeding 90 days supply will not be turned back at the border.
Having failed to get the cooperation of the FDA, the supporters of Big Pharma have now taken another approach. Led by Horton and LegitScript, they have put pressure to take down the websites of companies sending drugs to Americans via certain countries such as Vanuatu. Major drugmakers such as Ciplasupply drugs to intermediaries in Vanuatu, which are then shipped to the United States.
In an interview with Blue MauMau today, Horton denied that he is funded by the pharmaceutical industry.
The meeting at the White House is with representatives of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, ICANN, a not-for-profit U.S. organization that coordinates unique domain name identifiers across the world. It is the organization that ensures that domain name TacoBell.com is assigned and gets you there, and not to say, DelTaco.com.
For many years, foreign governments have been wary about how much influence the US government exercises over the Internet, and while ICANN and the US government have dismissed such concerns as unwarranted, the September 29 meeting may give new impetus to proposals to set up alternate webs which cannot be controlled by ICANN.
To have a low-level meeting at some agency office is one thing. But any meeting which is scheduled at the White House necessarily sends a message independent of the substantive content of the meeting. And to have the top ICANN officials summoned to discuss taking down internet access to companies which don't dance to the US tune is a remarkable start down a slippery slope.
A PharmacyChecker spokesperson told Blue MauMau that the company is run by a medical doctor. He argues that his firms certification standards are every bit as restrictive as legitscript, except that his firm allows non U.S. pharmacies to be certified.
Apart from the PharmacyChecker letter to the White House (posted on their website) the media has not picked up on this story. This is a story which has rammifications far beyond a few pills dispensed without a prescription. Once the genie is out of the bottle, it may be impossible to put it back.


Web Analytics Training

Google Confirms Ranking Change for Single Domains

from Acronym Media
http://www.acronym.com/keyworddriven/google-confirms-ranking-change-for-single-domains.html
Although initially perceived as a potential bug, it appears the recent change to Google’s search engine results page was intentional – and it’s here to stay, according to the Google Webmaster Central blog. Going forward, Google will now allow multiple listings per single domain to rank for branded keywords. Take a look at the screenshot below:
Yahoo Bing Screenshot
Previously, Google only allowed two listings per single domain, but as the above image dictates (courtesy of The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania), there’s now the potential for a single domain to hold multiple (or all of the) first page listings when conducting branded searches.
By delivering focused brand-centric results for direct searches, Google has decided that variety of domains is no longer necessary. Similarly, this user interface change will benefit users aiming to gather information from a very credible source: the brand itself.
This tweak could end up being experimental. However, in the meantime, search engine marketers should watch their organic traffic closely to spot any changes in branded traffic and conversion trends to see how this change directly affects each website.

Amazon.com Gets Patent for Selling and Leasing Domain Names

Amazon.com Gets Patent for Selling and Leasing Domain Names

Amazon granted patent for domain name marketplace.
Amazon domain namesAmazon.com subsidiary Amazon Technologies, Inc. was today granted U.S. patent number 7,805,379 for “Method and system for leasing or purchasing domain names”.
This patent, which was applied for in December 2007, seems to conflict with a number of existing domain name marketplace and domain monetization technologies that were commercially available at the time the patent application was filed.
One conflict in particular is Sendori, which offers a bidded marketplace to “lease” traffic that goes to a particular domain name. The leasing system described in Amazon’s patent would allow someone to go to a marketplace and lease a fraction or all of the traffic to a domain name. The marketplace would then split the traffic accordingly through a redirect. However, Amazon’s method may lease a percentage of traffic for a set period of time rather than on a per-visitor basis.
The marketplace could also offer domain names for sale and may also include some sort of valuation technology. You can read the full patent here (pdf). Abstract:
A method and system are described that enables a domain name owner (i.e., a “lessor”) to grant a third party (i.e., a “lessee”) a lease to any domain name the lessor owns. More specifically, a lessor may use a domain name service to allow a third party (i.e., a “lessee”) to lease a domain name for use or to purchase the domain name outright. More specifically, the lessor may lease a domain name to the lessee so that any user who accesses the leased domain name is redirected to a network resource identified by the lessee. The lessee may also be provided the option to purchase the domain name outright from the lessor, rather than lease it.

http://domainnamewire.com/2010/09/28/amazon-com-gets-patent-for-selling-and-leasing-domain-names/ 

Athens Plans .Athens Top Level Domain Name

Athens Plans .Athens Top Level Domain Name
Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

Municipality wants .athens, but may run into challenges with trademark application.
Add Athens to the list of municipalities that want to register their own top level domain names.
I haven’t seen anything on the web about the city’s plans, but it filed two trademark applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for “.Athens” and “dot .athens” back in February. I hadn’t seen these yet because the original applications didn’t list domain names as part of the goods and services for the marks.
When originally filed, the trademarks alluded generally to “telecommunications”, “education”, and “scientific and technological services”.
The trademark examiners suggested changes to the classes and the marks were amended last week.